click here to vote 2009 October | Video Contest News - Part 2 2009 October : Video Contest News

Archive for October, 2009

Crazy Cleaning Confessions

kenmore
Yesterday Kenmore announced the winners of their “Crazy Cleaning Confessions” video contest. Entrants were supposed to make a video that showed a wacky example of what they’ve done in the past to get their clothes or dishes clean. The top 3 prizes were all “high-efficiency” washers, dryers or dishwashers. Here’s the vid that snagged the Grand Prize:

Grand Prize. Prize: Washer and Dryer set

I think the most entertaining aspect of that video is that the two little boys were totally not into the whole thing. At one point the dad is trying to get them to take a bath in some clothes (so he can wash the kids and the clothes at the same time of course) and clearly the kids just want to GTFO of the tub and take off those sopping wet clothes as soon as possible. Hope the parents who made that video at least took those kids to Great America or something as thanks for winning them a free washer and dryer. Now, check out the second place (technically “first place”) winner.

First Place. Prize: Washer Set

This video is good for several reasons. For one, the “crazy confession” the lady gives is actually not a bad tip. Second, of all the talking-into-the-camera video contest entries I’ve seen, this is one of the best. She speaks very naturally and isn’t all nervous and phony. But the best thing about this video is that it shows you what Sarah Palin would be doing is she never ran for Governor of Alaska. Seriously! Watch that video and just picture Sarah Palin, Hockey Mom and former sports anchor from Wasilla making a video like that. Man….any video contest that makes you contemplate the possibilities of alternate realities is a pretty successful one I guess. Way to blow my mind, Kenmore.

2nd Annual Louisiana Hot Sauce Video Contest

hotsauce

I usually don’t post about new contests since there are plenty of other sites devoted to doing that. But the 2nd Annual Louisiana Hot Sauce Video Contest is a great example of what a GOOD contest looks like. What makes this a contest well worth entering?

1. First place gets you $5,000
2. There are two runner up prizes of $2500 and $500
3. There are no time limits on entries
4. There is no required info
5. Videos can be about basically whatever you want
6. View counts and votes don’t matter
7. Judges alone pick the winners
8. Just by entering you get a free t-shirt!

That’s how it should be done, son! Essentially there is only one rule in this contest; use a bottle of Original Louisiana hot sauce in your video. Having loose requirements will help insure that the sponsor gets a whole lot of interesting and crazy entries.

The deadline to enter is….January 31st!?!? That’s almost four months from now. Pfffft. If you’re anything like me you won’t be shooting an entry for this one until around January 25th.

Since this is the “Second Annual” Louisiana Hot Sauce Video contest I thought I’d look up the winning video of the First Annual Louisiana Hot Sauce Video Contest. It turned out to be a not so super-great rap video. I read that more that 70 videos were submitted to last year’s contest but this video was deemed to be the best of them all. Judges make odd choices sometimes.

Popularity Contest News

ecompliments

Ecompliments.com held a video contest where entrants were supposed to like, compliment somebody…I think. The actual rules or even the point of the whole thing don’t really matter. What matters is that the winner of the 10 Grand was decided by a public vote.

Letting “the public” pick the winner of a video contest is bad enough. But the organizers took things a step further and allowed the public to start voting before the end of the submission deadline. That means that the first people to upload videos had a huge advantage. Here’s the video that went on to win the top spot:

First Place. Prize: $10,000

That video wound up receiving 3,195 votes but the second place video (who won nothing) had only 1585 votes. This begs the question, how did such a blowout occur?

Turns out the dude who won the 10K has a huge youtube following. He does a web show called The DeFranco Update and he has himself 104,273 subscribers to his youtube channel! He added a link to his video so that if any of his fans wanted to vote for him all they had to do was click, register and vote. So did any of those 3,195 voters watch any of the other videos before they decided that the Defraco Report guy’s entry was the best? Of course not. They just voted for the guy they already liked and then moved on.

And I don’t blame Defranco Report guy for this one bit. Yes he had an advantage over the other contestants because he already had a fan base but you can’t hold it against the guy for making the most of the opportunity when it came along. I’ve had some videos go viral before and though it’s fun to see your view count rise, you can’t help but wish there was some way to make real money off of all those clicks. So the winner of the contest just found a unique way to make money off his internet celebrity.

The organizers of the contest seem to realize that they basically messed up and held a $10,000 popularity contest. The Ecompliments contest website says…..

“We will be running a new contest with new rules in January. A panel will determine the winner based on a combination of factors. Although votes will be a primary factor it will not be the only one. The video requirements will be more tightly focused on “compliments” and “sharing the good.” There will be a grand prize and prizes for second and third place.”

Sounds like they probably got whole lot of complaints about how the winner was picked. But good for them for doing a whole new contest. Hey, maybe I can shoot an entry for the new contest where I compliment the organizers for doing a new and improved contest!

Cheaters CAN prosper!

twirl

Temptation, thy name is TwirlTV. For the last few days I have been wrestling with an ethical dilemma. To force myself to do the right thing I’ll blog about my mildly-evil plan rather than carry it out.

I don’t know what Twirl TV is. Some type of Hulu thing maybe? Who cares? Point is they’re holding a video contest that seems designed to reward cheaters. The idea is that you make a 15 or 30 second promo for, or a 3 minute parody of, your favorite TV show. Then you upload the thing to youtube and forward the link to Twirl TV within 6 hours of the upload time so they can keep track of it.

Now, here’s the BS part: Whichever video has the highest VIEW COUNT by October 16th wins $1,000.

Can you believe that? What is the friggin’ point!? It is so easy to increase your view count on youtube it’s embarrassing. Obviously you can just sit at your computer hitting the play button over and over but with the help of a very basic add-on to your internet browser you can race to the top of any “highest view count wins” contest in no time at all. Because I couldn’t believe the rules of this contest I wrote the organizers. Here is the e-mail I sent them:

“I have a question about the Twirl TV video contest. I wanted to enter but I saw that the winning video will be the one with the highest view count on youtube. Getting a high view count on youtube is very, very easy. You just need to know a few super easy computer tricks and you can automatically rack up views. How are you guys going to ensure that a cheater doesn’t win the contest? I’d hate to spend my time shooting a video only to find out some guy with an auto-refresher won by a landslide.”

And here is the actual response I got from Twirl TV:

“Thank you for you interest in our contest. We understand the possible use of automatic refreshers and developed a judging prize that is equal in value. The judging panel will consist of a TV producer and two of our top two Twirl TV users. We look forward to seeing your video and i will gladly answer any additional questions.”

-contest@twirltv.com

Translation: We know and we don’t care. The people behind this contest understand that this “view count” race is going to be won by a cheater. They’re also giving away a $1,000 video camera to the video they like best so who cares about the view count contest? I do, that’s who. This is just total and complete laziness on the part of the organizers of this contest. Oh, laziness and stupidity.  A “highest view count wins” contest could only be dreamed up by people who have no clue how the internet works these days. These type of people keep hearing about Twitter and yotube and Digg and facebook and they feel the need to jump on the viral video/social networking bandwagon even though they don’t know where the bandwagon is going or why.

At some point, the marketing people who came up with this contest had to explain it to the tech people who were supposed to set it up. I’m a tech guy and I’ve had to deal with marketing people before and some of them can be really thick-headed. They are “idea people” who get tunnel vision when they think they have an ingenious plan. Maybe some IT nerd tried to speak up and suggest how easy it would be for someone to get an artificially high view count. But the marketing people didn’t care. As long as it LOOKED like a lot of people had watched these promos then they could tell their bosses that the contest was a huge success. “We’re happy to report that the video contest entries had a combined view count of over 200,000!” they’ll say. “That means we exposed our brand to 200,000 people and only spent $2,000. Look how awesome at marking we are!”

After I got the e-mail back from Twirl TV I honestly thought good and hard about entering and then doing the things it would take for me to ensure a win. There are still 8 days to go in the contest and right now the most viewed video in the competition only has 1,700 views. Pffffft. I could shoot and upload a video today and have 1,700 “views” by midnight. But I’ve decided that $1,000 just isn’t worth the guilt I’d feel.

However….that guilt wouldn’t extend beyond my own head.  If I were to upload a video for this contest and then auto-refresh myself to a view count victory I would technically not be cheating.  BECAUSE THE RULES OF THE CONTEST DO NOT PROHIBIT SUCH ACTIVITY.  There’s no way that Twirl TV could ever track which IP addresses your video’s views came from but even if they could, replaying your own video over and over is not against the rules.  So if you’re in the mood to make an easy $1,000 go knock your self out.

Australia is confusing

australia

Ok, I am confused. I am confused by Australia; both the country and the continent.  Today I saw the results of the “Learn, Live and Grow; Study in Australia video contest.”  The point of the contest was to explain why it’s awesome to study abroad in Australia. Here’s the winning video:

First Place. Prize: A trip to Australia

For the most part it’s a funny entry and really covers all the bases that were required by the contest. So why am I in such a kerfuffle? Because First Prize in this contest is a trip to Australia….and the dude who won SHOT THAT ENTRY WHILE IN AUSTRALIA.

From the winning student’s mini-bio that’s up on the contest site, it looks like he’s already returned home to Canada. But still, doesn’t it seem weird that the guy was apparently just in Australia a few weeks ago and now he’s already got a free trip back? Couldn’t they have maybe given the prize to someone who wasn’t already in Australia while the contest was going on?? Oh well. Some Canadians have all the luck I guess.

Wait a second…this guy didn’t win a “trip” to Australia.  He won 2 round-trip plane tickets to Australia.  Man, that kinda sucks.  They couldn’t spring for a couple nights in a hotel?  On the plus side, at least I’m not jealous of that guy anymore.

Crash the Superbowl: 35 days to go

Doritos: One is too many and a million's not enough

Doritos: One is too many and a million's not enough

Know what I’m doing right now? I am…honest to God, eating a bag of Doritos. I haven’t consciously bought a bag of Doritos in at least a year. And even then I’m sure I bought them to take to a party. I’m just not really a “chip” guy if you know what I mean. But here I am with orange fingers, crunching away.

So clearly Dorito’s Crash the Superbowl contest has been a tremendous success. In a survey I conducted with myself, 100% of participants indicate that since the announcement of the Dorito’s contest, their Doritos consumption has gone through the roof. (margin of error: +/- 100%)

I really want to shoot an entry for the Crash the Superbowl contest but I’ve got a bad case of filmmaker’s block. (that’s a thing, right?) So I thought I’d actually buy the kind of giant bag of Doritos you always see in commercials. The good news is that I’ve learned that eating like 30 Doritos for lunch is a pretty F#$%ing fun way to pass a Monday afternoon. The bad news is that all the ideas I’ve been coming up with are kind of weird and complicated. Right now I could shoot a really awesome short film or two about Doritos but I just have not been able to come up with a solid 30 second idea.

And the pressure to get shooting is building. There are now 35 DAYS left to submit an entry for the challenge and already 47 entries have been submitted. 47 entries! That’s more than a lot of video contests will get after 6 months. Who are these freaks that are submitting their commercials 5 weeks before the deadline!?

crash

Click to see the first 'Crash' entries

Because I am crazy, I watched all 47 sentries over the last few days. The Verdict? There are some funny ideas but none of the videos have the necessary production quality to be shown on TV. That’s not really a huge surprise though. I’m guessing most of the people who will make the finals are in the middle of pre-production right now.

Beardy’s Choice: This Butterfinger’s mine

In the previous post I wrote about “Butterfinger Phone App” which just won $25,000 in the Butterfinger video contest. Well I watched probably 80% of the posted entries and there’s one video that stood out above all others. This great video didn’t even make it to the finals, which was a real surprise. Anyway, if Beardy picked the winners this is the video I would have chosen. It’s called “This Butterfinger’s Mine” and I dare you not to hit the replay button after you watch it for the first time:



Hope you like that song because it’s gonna be stuck in your head alllll day long.

Butterfinger winner and weird voting weirdness

Butterfinger announced the winner of the “Nobody’s Gonna Lay a Finger on my Butterfinger” video contest on Thursday. Of the 4 finalist videos, here’s the one that came out on top:

First Place. Prize: $25,000


Now, when the voting period ended I predicted that the posted scores would change dramatically before the winners were announced because Butterfinger would check for vote fraud and throw out multiple votes that all came from the same IP address. Well….I was half right. The final vote counts are now very different than what they were when voting ended. Except, ummmmm, everyone’s vote totals went UP and not down.

Each of the four finalist videos each have at least 1,000 more votes today then they did when the voting ended. The vote buttons were removed from the site when the contest closed so there’s no way people could have somehow been casting votes since then. (Click here to see the Butterfinger vote totals as they were on September 23rd and click here to see the vote totals as the are today.)

So what happened? Why did the winning video, “Butterfinger Phone App” have 12,974 votes on September 23rd but now has 16,556 votes on October 4th? Where did 3582 new votes come from in that time?? I actually don’t think anything shady went on with the vote. Now that I see that it was a massive blow out (the 2nd place video has 13,626 votes) I think the chance there was large-scale fraud by any of the contestants is slim. Without the aid of some kind of voting program there’s no way to generate that many fake votes. So Beardy decrees this to be a clean win for Butterfinger Phone App.

But the question remains; why did the vote totals jump after the contest ended? My guess is that votes in different parts of the country were registered on different servers. So in the last 2 weeks, Butterfinger had to seek out every vote and add it to the total. That’s a really crappy way to run a vote though. Youtube sort of works that way (ever wonder why your view count only goes up in big jumps after you hit 300 views?) but youtube tabulates its info from all its servers a few times a day. Why wouldn’t the butterfinger vote work the same way? Would butterfinger withhold votes on purpose to keep the contest competitive? On the day that voting ended, the first and second place videos were only separated by less than 700 votes. How did that slim margin turn into a 2928 lead for Butterfinger Phone App? This does seem sort of shady and I think it might have been an intentional tactic on Butterfinger’s part. Whatever the case, I suspect the jumping Butterifnger scores will always remain a video contest mystery.


Designed by: Free Cell Phones | Thanks to Highest CD Rates, Domain Registration and Registry Software