Votes | Video Contest News votes : Video Contest News

Posts Tagged ‘votes’

When is the best time to post vote requests on facebook?

Last Friday I shot, edited and submitted a video to Ecos’ “Get Washed” video contest and despite the quick production, I think it’s one of the best video contest entries ever done.  It’s simple but quirky and it features one of the best actresses I’ve ever worked with.  It’s also probably the greatest color correction job I’ve done, period.  (One of the tough things about filming in the woods is that the light is uneven and everything has a yellowish-green hue.)  The shooting and editing might have only taken a few hours but I had to put a surprising amount of pre-production work into this project.  Just picking up and dropping off the giant squirrel suit took about 5 hours! Because the whole commercial is basically just a monologue, I knew casting would be crucial.  After days of searching I finally found a fantastic actress and she just knocked it out of the park.

The top prizes in this contest are $10K and $5K and I think I might actually have a decent shot.  There is a public voting phase to determine the Top 25 videos though.  After the voting is done, judges alone will chose the top winners.  I didn’t think I’d really need to hustle for votes for this contest but Ecos wound up getting almost 90 entries!  So if you’ve got 5 seconds to spare, I’d appreciate it if you could click on this image and vote for my submission.  And if you’ve got 35 seconds to spare, you can even watch it if you’d like.

Click to view and/or vote!

Today is the first day of voting which happens to be a sunday.  And that’s kind of unusual because most contests start and finish their voting phases on week days.  When the voting went live this morning I posted a request for votes on my personal facebook page.  But then I stopped and thought about the timing of my request; how many people would actually see it?  How many people are even on facebook at 10AM on a Sunday?  I don’t like to bombard my facebook friends with a ton of video contest vote requests so I only ask for votes a few times each contest.  (If all your facebook posts are about contests, you’re friends are just going to get annoyed and block or limit your posts.  So a ton of requests can really backfire on you.  Plus like I said, it’s just annoying and not cool)

So if I’m only going to ask for votes 2 or 3 times, I want to make sure I post those requests at the right time.  But what is “the right time”?  Basically what I want to know is, when is facebook busiest?  Unfortunately, Facebook isn’t saying.  And that’s not surprising because if they actually came out announced the best time of day to post something, every company would start posting stuff at that time. But it seems that this question does have an answer.  A social Network Management company named Virtue conducted a study of facebook activity about a year and a half ago.  You can read a breakdown of the study here but it looks like the best time to post a vote request (or anything, really) on facebook probably is…

2:55PM on a Wednesday.

According to the study, facebook is constantly getting a ton of traffic.  But there is always a spike in activity around 3pm on weekdays.  You should try and post just before 3:00 because a lot of people sign in right at the top of the hour.  (Maybe that’s when the TV show they were watching ended or maybe that’s when their afternoon break begins.)  This spike happens every day but Wednesdays are usually facebook’s busiest day of the week.

According to the study, posts that are done in the morning actually get seen/liked/shared more than afternoon posts.  But a vote request isn’t a typical facebook post.  In the morning people are signing into facebook right at the start of the day.  9:00AM is not goof-off time…it’s a time to sign in really quick to check messages and skim the news feed.  By late afternoon, people are signing into facebook because they’re bored.  So you want to get your vote requests in front of people who have some time to kill.

Keep in mind that if you live LA but all your family and friends live back in Chicago, you should probably post your requests at 3:00PM Chicago time.  Oh and by the way, as it turns out the weekend really is a bad time to post anything to facebook.  These days, only about 30% of employers block facebook so most people spend time on the site while at work.  So you can post a vote request on a sunday morning (like I did today before I saw the Virtue study) but it won’t get you too many clicks.

Oh and PS:  Happy Mother’s Day from VCN and Mark Wahlberg!

-

 

Tips for using GetOnlineVotes.com

Banner for getonlinevotes.com

I know that a lot of video contest filmmakers hate it when contests let online voting help determine the winners.  So do I.  I can’t even imagine how many contests I would have won if quality was the only thing that mattered to the judges.  But contest organizers LOVE online voting.  Every time a contestant asks for votes on facebook or twitter or on their blog, that’s free advertising for the sponsor.  And you can’t really blame contest organizers for wanting to get as much exposure for their company as possible.  After all, if it wasn’t for the publicity, most companies wouldn’t even bother running a contest in the first place.  So if you want to make money in video contests, you have just got to accept the fact that getting votes is just part of the game.  And once you do, you can start developing strategies to win vote-based competitions.

If you’re really serious about winning a contest, you’ll need to try and get votes from people outside of your social circle.   How do you do that?  Well I suggest you try the site GetOnlineVotes.com.  GOV is what contest junkies refer to as a “vote exchange.”  When a person needs votes in a contest they can post their link on GOV and ask for votes.  Then other people who need votes in other contests vote for that entry.  Then they post a comment that includes their own link and ask the original contestant to vote for them.  So basically, the whole thing is based on the premise, “you vote for me and I’ll vote for you.”

And it works.  It works great, actually.  I just learned abut the site recently but I’ve tried it 2 or 3 times now.  And if you really work the website, you can get dozens or even hundreds of votes from GOV.  But I’ve noticed a lot of people who use the exchange sabotage their chances by making some simple but key mistakes.  So I thought I’d make a quick list of tips to help you get more votes on GetOnlineVotes.com.

  1. Before you post your vote request, make sure that swapping votes does not violate your contest’s rules.  Most contests don’t care where votes come from.  As long as they are getting web traffic or new sign ups or facebook fans, they’re happy.  But some contests prohibit offering “inducements” to get people to vote for an entry.  For example, I was recently in a contest sponsored by Excedrin and they had a “no inducements rule.”  Several contestants used GetOnlineVotes.com and all of them were disqualified!  So for sure, check before you post.
  2. Keep it brief.  GOV gives you the option to say something about you or the contest you’re entering before you post your voting instructions.  You are required to fill in the space so keep it as brief as possible.  One sentence is all you need.  A huge explanation just makes it look like voting for you will be complicated.
  3.  Make your instructions as easy as possible.  A wordy or confusing explanation will just scare voters away.  This seems like a no-brainer but a lot of people over-explain the voting process.  Just post the link, and present STEP 1, STEP 2, STEP 3, etc.  But be aware, if you really do have more than 2 or 3 steps, not many people are going to want to spend so much time on one vote.  The more votes people make, the more they get in return.  Just keep that in mind.
  4. Promise that you will return all votes and ask people to leave their link.  This make other users feel like a vote for you will result in a guaranteed return vote.
  5. Vote for everyone that leaves a comment on your post!  Some jerks will post their request, let people vote for them and then not return the favor.  So let people know that you are voting by replying to all comments.  If other users see that you are replying “I voted!” to every comment, they’ll know you’re good about returning votes.
  6. Work the site.  Vote for other people and leave comments asking for return votes.  But try and focus on only voting for people who will actually vote for you in return.
  7. Consider Re-Listing your Post after a few days.  GOV doesn’t allow you to post the same vote request over and over.  But for just $3.95 you can have your post put back at the top of the list of requests.

I was actually inspired to write this article because I just submitted a vote request to GetOnlineVotes.  So here’s what a nice, simple request looks like:

Click to view the actual listing

Granted, this isn’t exactly a typical GOV request because the “voting’ is done on youtube.  Most of the contests listed on the site are run through facebook.  Still, other GOV users are actually voting for my video.  All I need to do to win the $1,000 “Crowd Favorite” prize in this particular contest is get the most youtube likes.  And I think I can pull it off, fair and square.  I can get a lot of likes through youtube since I have more than 3,500 subscribers.  But GetOnlineVotes.com will probably be the thing that puts me over the top.  Of course, I’d certainly love to get some likes from you VCN readers.  So if you want to help me out, head here and give me a like.  Thanks!

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nQAXJIuCS28

October 24th Update: I won the “Crowd Favorite” prize! Thanks for the votes everybody. I told you GOV works!

 

Magic Bullet’s Kitchen Magician winner

It feels like Magic Bullet’s “Kitchen Magician” contest has been running forever but last week they finally crowned their winner.  Here she is:

Grand Prize Winner.  Prize: $10,000 and a trip to Los Angeles:

Click to watch

Yep, the winner’s entry was shot with an iPhone.  But this wasn’t really a contest where quality mattered.  This was really more about shooting an audition for a Magic Bullet infomercial.  In the first round, the three contestants with the most votes got to go to LA and shoot a two-minute, mini-infomercial.  Then a panel of judges watched the infomercials and picked their favorite host as their grand prize winner.

Hmmmm….I feel like I should say more about this contest but there isn’t really anything else to cover.  I guess I could talk about the Magic Bullet for a bit.  Hey, am I the only person that’s creeped out by the name “The Magic Bullet?”  The “magic bullet” is what killed JFK!  I know it’s been almost 50 years since the Kennedy assassination but it still feels too soon to appropriate the phrase “The Magic Bullet” and turn it into a thing that makes guacamole.  I happen to think “The Bay of Pigs” would be a pretty clever name for a seaside BBQ place but that doesn’t mean I would ever eat there.

Facebook starts shutting down unauthorized contests

On Wednesday, Facebook made some important changes to their “Promotions Guidelines” that video contest filmmakers should be aware of.  Thousands and thousands of companies (and even individuals) have been running contests of all types using their facebook pages. That’s not exactly legal though so Facebook is cracking down and deleting unauthorized contests.  But this isn’t just a legal thing. If some small business runs a contest where voters have to “like’ their page and then vote by “liking” an entry, well…facebook doesn’t make any money off of that. So now if Joe’s Pizza of Akron, Ohio wants to run an ultimate fan video contest they need to pay a facebook-approved company to run that contest as an app. Here are some of the more interesting restrictions from Facebook’s Promotions Guidelines:

Promotions on Facebook must be administered within Apps on Facebook.com, either on a Canvas Page or an app on a Page Tab.

You must not use Facebook features or functionality, such as the Like button, as a voting mechanism for a promotion.

You must not condition registration or entry upon the user taking any action using any Facebook features or functionality other than liking a Page, checking in to a Place, or connecting to your app.

These new rules probably won’t have any effect on most of the facebook-based video contests you may encounter.  But beware: If you come across a video contest where likes count as votes, don’t enter! Because that contest (and the sponsors page) could be zapped out of existence at any moment.

And that’s a good thing.  Unauthorized contests are sketchy and I personally don’t enter them.  On the other hand, I think video contests that are run as facebook apps are great. It’s easy to get people to vote since you don’t have to register.  Even better though, it’s really hard for people to vote for themselves over and over on facebook.  The big name in facebook-based video contests seems to be a company called Wildfireapp.  (http://www.wildfireapp.com)  So man, these new changes are going to be really good news for them.  Wildfire is running the Dairy Queen contest I’m in right now and I’m pretty happy with how it’s going.  Oh yeah….did I mention I’m a finalist in Dairy Queen’s “Mini Blizzard Treatment contest!?”  I have a 1 in 6 chance of winning one of six Mini Coopers!!  But I need votes to win.  If you haven’t already, please do me a major solid and vote for my video.  It only takes like 5 seconds plus you’ll get to see a real life App-run facebook contest with your own eyes!

CLICK THE IMAGE TO VOTE!

Voting is open until May 17th so vote while you can!  You only need to vote once though.  This is a really exciting contest and I swear, if I win i will be RETIRING from video contests that use votes alone to determine the winners.  Trying to get people to vote for you is just too much work!

One again, click here to vote:  http://apps.facebook.com/winaminicar/contests/98909

THANKS FOR THE SUPPORT EVERYBODY!!!

 

OnlineVideoContest.com’s awesome new features

Onlinevideocontests.com is easily one of my favorite websites on the entire Internet that doesn’t feature boobs or captioned cat photos.  Until now they’ve pretty much focused on doing just one thing, really, really well; listing video contests.  The design of the site is PERFECT.  It’s clean, user-friendly and simply cool-looking.  You can even do custom searches for contests based on specific criteria like whether or not they use judges or public voting to determine the winners!  It’s just awesome and I can honestly say that the site has helped me find more than a few contests that I went on to win.

And the the folks at “OVC” have made a good thing even better by adding some great new features to the site.  Registered users can now post their winning videos in the “WINNERS” section and if a filmmaker needs votes to win a contest, they can post their video in the “UP FOR VOTE” section.  I expect to be making use of both features in the near future.  Follow the links to check out the new stuff:

http://www.onlinevideocontests.com/winners

http://www.onlinevideocontests.com/upforvote

Results of the Aflac 10 second “Video Contest”

aflaccontest

The Aflac 10 second video challenge is a great example of the type of video contest you should absolutely, positively stay away from.  Sure, the grand prize was $25,000 but unless you’re an internet celebrity you didn’t stand much chance of winning this one.  The problem with the Aflac contest is that no matter how awesome your video was the only way to have a shot at the grand prize was if you got enough votes to get you into the top 10.  And according to this article 180 entries were received and more than 69,000 votes were cast.  That’s 383 votes per video!  I’ve followed the voting of a lot of video contests and I’ve learned that with a few high-profile exceptions like the Crash the Superbowl contest, strangers won’t take the time to register and vote for some contest video they have no stake in.  One reason strangers do vote for entries in the Crash the Superbowl contest is because they give Superbowl tickets away every day to one random voter.  But I don’t think Aflac awarded any such voter prizes.

So….video quality was totally irrelevant in the first round of this contest.  That means there were only two ways for a filmmaker to have a chance of winning.  Either they had to already have a pretty serious online following that would unite to propel them into the top ten or they had to vote for themselves over and over and over. The fact that “69,000” votes were cast in this contest isn’t something to brag about.  That is a crazy high number and it’s a tell-tale sign of cheating.  The average vote count per video was 383.  How many people out there even KNOW 383 people, let alone 383 that will take the time to vote for your goofy Aflac commercial?

If you know how video contest work, the numbers here are very suspicious.  But to most folks, it sounds like Aflac must be doing a great job connecting with the much sought after, social network crowd.  Check out this quote from the article I mentioned:

“The passion of the contestants who creatively used their own social networks, generating hundreds of thousands of page views and millions of impressions, combined with their knowledge of our products blew us away,” said Aflac Senior Vice President and Chief Marketing Officer Jeff Charney. “It is clear that people are starting to get to know Aflac and are beginning to learn that we are more than a household name; we are a household need.”

That right there is why you shouldn’t enter video contests like this.  Because this wasn’t a video contest.  This was a SOCIAL NETWORKING contest.  Your entry in the contest was just an excuse for you to send out links to Aflac’s website.  They cared about “page views” and gauging the public’s knowledge of their products, not quality entries.  So why in the world would you ever want to spend time and energy making a video for a contest like that?  Aflac had to realize that they were holding a contest that would encourage people to cheat to win it.  I’m guessing they actually wanted cheating to happen because the more votes were cast, the more “connected” with web-users they would seem.

180 entries is about what the Skinit.com video contest got and they also had a grand prize of $25,000.  So I guess 180 entries is a pretty good estimate of how many submissions a contest of this size should get.  So…before you go entering a “video contest” like this, ask yourself; do I have a large enough social network to get more votes than 171 other people?

The video that won the Aflac challenge is very well made.  It’s not insanly awesome though.  I have to wonder, what video would have won the $25K if Aflac gave the prize to the BEST entry?

First Place.  Prize: $25,000

Did anybody enter this contest?  Anybody know what you had to do to register to vote?  Or if you could vote more than once?  If you have any info, leave a comment.

Vote-Based video contests: A Cautionary Tale

ivoted

Last fall, I found a contest sponsored by Fed-Ex called the “Why I need a bailout” video contest. Apparently, Fed-ex’s rival, UPS was lobbying for a bailout and the contest was designed to mock them. Fed-ex even built a whole website dedicated to making fun of “The Brown Bailout.“  The concept for the site and the video contest was harsh and kinda mean-spirited…so I knew I had to enter. The idea was that you were supposed to explain why you needed a bailout and Fed-Ex would give 5 people a thousand bucks each. Plus, every finalist would get 100 bucks!

Normally I don’t enter contests with such a low top prizes but since there were 5 prizes up for grabs and I figured it’d be worth a few hours of my time. So I wrote, shot and submitted what turned out to be a really good entry. But I had been a little too eager to enter this one. I read the rules after I submitted and realized I probably had just wasted my time….

The 5 winners were to be determined by a public vote.

Crap. Fed-ex was supposed to pick 10 to 30 finalists and the public would vote for their favorites. Turns out they only got like 30 entries and so everyone got to be a finalist. All humility aside, my entry was easily the best. Hands down, all the way, the best. I sent out links to friends and tried to get some votes. But immediately I noticed that the scores of certain videos were surging upwards. To vote, you had to enter your name and some other info, fill in a CAPTCHA and the hit the “VOTE” button. But I, and about 10 of the other finalists quickly realized that if you cleared your web browser’s history and then refreshed the page, you could vote again and again and again. And here’s the most outrageous part…the contest’s rules in no way forbid voting for yourself as many times as you wanted! In fact, the rules actually said You can vote for your favorite video as many times as you want!! A free-for-all was inevitable.

yuck.

yuck.

After a few days of trying to get votes, I gave up. All I could do was watch in amazement as some of the other contestants added hundreds of votes to their scores a day. In the end, the top 5 winners had thousands of votes. (and some of the losing videos had fewer than 50!) Going at a steady pace, re-peat voters were probably able to post 5 votes a minute which means they spent dozens of hours voting for themselves over and over and over. It was interesting to see some of them give up one at a time. Certain videos would get hundreds of new votes a day and then suddenly, their vote counts stopped going up. The 10-way race went down to a 9-way, then a 8-way, then a 7-way race. The people I felt sorry for were the ones that voted for themselves more than a thousand times but could never catch up to the people who eventually made the top 5.

It was obvious to anyone who looked at the contest site that the winners had cheated (well, technically they hadn’t “cheated” since re-voting wasn’t against the rules but it certainly looked like cheating) I tried to contact Fed-ex and got no response. I got an e-mail announcing the winners and that was it. But the winners were so embarrassing (seriously, some of them were like cell phone quality videos shot in dark rooms) and the cheating was so flagrant that Fed-Ex pretended like the whole thing never happened. They removed all the videos, hid the contest page and didn’t even mention the results on the “Brown Bailout” blog (they had been hyping the contest there for weeks.)  All links to the contest page had been removed from the site but I had bookmarked it.  They did list the winners but…and this blows my mind, there is no way to actually watch the winning videos.  What kind of video contest doesn’t even give links to the winning videos??  A really crappy one, that’s what kind.

On the bright side, at least they did send me my 100 bucks for making the finals.

A few weeks back I saw a listing for BlueBerry Muffin Tops’s “Blast of Blueberry” video contest and thought about entering for about half a minute. But then I saw in the rules that the sponsor would pick some finalists and then the “public” would vote for the winner…and that winner would only get a $1,500 prize. The logistics of that contest flashed me back to that sad, Fed-Ex “Brown Bailout” contest. That one sucked so much that I was too embarrassed to even write about it here when it went down. With those dark memories fresh in my head, I back-paged away as quickly as I could from the Blueberry Muffin Top site and thought to myself “I sure feel bad for the suckers who are going to enter that contest.”

Turns out, one of the suckers who entered that contest is a fan of VCN! A reader named Matt wrote me and explained he had made it to the “BBMT” finals. His entry is definitely one of the best and I voted for it. You can too by clicking here:

http://blueberrymuffintops.malt-o-meal.com/videos/

You have to register to vote of course. Matt’s entry is the one that has the thumbnail of a test subject talking to a scientist.  Here’s a direct link:  Matt’s Video.

Matt’s certainly going to have a tough time winning this one. If you’ve ever entered a vote-based video contest you know that money makes people go fucking apeshit crazy. Sure, $1,500 is a lot but some contestants will spend dozens and dozens of hours registering and voting, registering and voting, registering and voting just so they can win a little cash.

I’ve entered a few vote-based video contests over the years but Fed-Ex’s Brown Bailout contest was the last straw for me. After that one ended, I decided never again to enter a contest where the winners were picked solely by “public vote.” Really, it just isn’t worth the effort to pester my family and friends to vote for my video if some jerks are just going to sit at their computer all day and vote for themselves over and over. So heed my warnings; if a contest is letting the public pick it’s winner, DO NOT ENTER.

Designed by: Free Cell Phones | Thanks to Highest CD Rates, Domain Registration and Registry Software