Youtube | Video Contest News youtube : Video Contest News

Posts Tagged ‘youtube’

How to get unlimited, real youtube views

Youtube: Where all your viral dreams come true

Every once and a while I will come across a “viral” video contest where the winner is determined by youtube views.  And when I do see a contest like that, it takes a lot of will power for me NOT to enter.  You see, in my time running this website I have learned a lot of shady tricks; and “how to get to get tons of fake youtube views” is one of those tricks.  Basically if you go to the right website you can order all the views you want.  But those “views” are just fake, junk views.  They’re just generated by some guy in India using a computer that is constantly changing its IP address. (or something like that)  They don’t come from real people.  So in most “viral” contests, buying fake views would be considered cheating.  If you buy fake views, there is a good chance you’ll get caught because fake views leave evidence behind.  And not only could you get disqualified from the contest you’re in, you could be kicked off of youtube for violating the site’s Terms of Service.

So like I said, I try not to enter “viral” video contests.  But about two months ago I came across a contest that was being run by a new micro-jobs website that I just had to enter.  The competition was being run in two stages.  In the first stage, people were supposed to create funny videos about giraffes (The website’s mascot is a giraffe) and then try to get as many youtube views as they could in four weeks.  The people who created the Top 5, most viewed submissions got to go on to round two where they would compete for $15,000.  I decided to enter but I promised myself I would NOT buy fake youtube views.  (here’s my submission)  I figured that with the resources I have at my disposal I could get into the Top 5, fair and square.  This website just keeps getting more and more traffic so I stuck a banner ad for my own video at the top of this page.  And man, did that get me a lot of views!  Plus, I have a kind of popular youtube channel with a few thousand subscribers.  So I was able to get a good chunk of views from there too.

But inevitably, as the view count deadline approached, the cheating began.  Several other contestants started buying fake views and I was pushed out of the Top 5.  I contacted the contest organizers and I explained how you could tell when someone’s view count was phony.  But they said they really couldn’t do anything about it because the practice wasn’t actually against the rules.  (So technically, it wasn’t even cheating!)  So basically I recived the OK from the contest organizers to do whatever I could to get in the Top 5.  But I still didn’t want to take the easy way out.  So I started looking for a legitimate solution to my problem.

And I found that solution in like five minutes.  It turns out that any youtube user can now sign up for the site’s “Promoted Videos” program.  Basically you can now buy views from youtube!  Except unlike the other views you can buy, these are REAL views that come from REAL people.  If you use youtube’s promotions program to get 10,000 views, it means that 10,000 different people actually watched your video.  So while some might consider this bending the rules of a viral video contest, no one could claim that you’re breaking the rules since your views are coming from real people and since you’re not violating youtube’s terms of service.

Here’s how the program works:  After you sign up, you pick which video you want to promote.  Then you tell youtube how much you are willing to pay per view.  I think I went with 12 cents but you can go even lower.  And remember, that is the most you are willing to pay per view.  You then get to select the keywords you want associated with your video.  So if your video has a giraffe in it (like mine did) you can select “giraffe” as a keyword.  Then when someone searches for giraffe videos on youtube, your video will appear in the “Promoted Videos” sidebar.  The more specialized a keyword is, the more you will pay per-click.  Here’s a a screengrab of my Promoted Videos Dashboard that shows the keywords I used for my giraffe video:

Note: I cut out the irrelevant parts of this chart in photoshop

So even though I “bid” 12 cents per view, most of my views only cost me 2 or 3 cents.  And as you can see, the keyword “funny” was the most popular keyword by a long shot.

After you set your keywords, you tell youtube how much you want to spend every day promoting your videos.  If you say “$5,00″ youtube will run your video as an ad all day until you have spent $5.00.  I think the best thing about this program is how fast the process is.  If you want a huge number of views right away, you can tell youtube you want to spend $200 a day.  Youtube will pimp your video like crazy and by end of the day, you’ll have thousands of real views.  Here’s what your “dashboard” will look like once your “campaign” is up and running:

Again, this was photo-shopped to save space

The final view count for my giraffe entry was about 16,000.  And that was enough to get me into the finals.  As you can see, I recived 10,659 views thanks to youtube’s promoted video program.  And that means I was able to get 6,000 views on my own.  And that’s pretty damn good!  If the other contestants hadn’t bought fake views, I would have been able to get in the Top 5 without any help from youtube.

So youtube’s Promoted Videos program is pretty much just a giant, view-creating machine.  However many views you want, you can get.  And you only get charged when someone actually clicks on your video.  But there is one major drawback to this program; this s&%# ain’t cheap.  I spent about $300 to get those 10,000 views.  So was it a wise purchase?  Well, the results of the contest I was will be officially announced on November 1st so check back here on Monday to see how I did.  Ok, spoiler alert:  I didn’t win the grand prize but I did win some cash.  But don’t tell anyone I told you that.

 

Voting begins in Sprint’s “Epic” video contest

Like I said a few posts back I haven’t entered a video contest that used public-votes to determine its winners in quite a while because those type of contests almost always devolve into chaos. And it’s also been a while since I did a post about another filmmaker’s attempts to win a vote-based contest.  But long-time VCN reader Tim O. sent me link to his entry in Sprint’s “Epic Contest” and it’s so good it deserves a plug.

The Epic Contest is actually using a vote-based contest model that I don’t mind so much; voters pick a bunch of finalists and then those finalists go on to be judged by the sponsor.  Well that’s the way it normally works.  In this case, 10 finalists are screened by Captain Explosion, AKA Michael Bay and he picks one, $25,000 winner.  Videos submitted to this contest where supposed to be epic in nature.  Here’s Tim O.’s entry.  To view it and vote for him, just click this image.

Click here to see a seriously epic contest entry

That was so tight it’s disgusting.  It looks like “Epic Fall” is one of the top rated videos at the moment and if it makes it to the top 10 I think Mr. Bay will be hard pressed to choose a better winner.  Plus it’s got smashing concrete and slow motion in it and that dude loves that shit.

The contest website records your IP address so you’re only able to vote once per day.  It’s a pretty effective system.  But apparently, this contest was beset by a lot of other problems.  A LOT of people assumed that “epic” was code for “violent” and went out and shot graphic action scenes.  But those folks all broke the #1 rule of video contest filmmaking; they didn’t read the rules before they started working on their entries.  The rules state that videos “must not depict any dangerous activities or situations.”  And here’s a bigger chunk of the rules:

“Submissions cannot communicate messages or images inconsistent with the positive images and/or goodwill to which Sponsor wishes to associate.  Sponsor, judges reserve the right, in their sole discretion, to disqualify any Submission that, in their sole opinion, refers, depicts or in any way reflects negatively upon the Sponsor, the Contest or any other person or entity, or does not comply with these requirements or these Official Rules”

So all the eager beavers out there that shot action-filled, Bad Boys-esque shoot ‘em ups wound up having their videos disqualified.  At least you have the chance to learn from their mistakes.  Remember, always read the rules before you shoot.  I know most contest rules read like stereo instructions but you have to read them.  Because you can’t win a contest if you don’t make a legitimate entry, now can you?

Leaked! How to make a viral video

Yesterday I heard from another contestant in Doritos’ Viralocity video contest and he asked me to check out his video.  That of course is code for “please consider posting this on your blog!” Well, the video turned out to be great so I will indeed post it.  Not only is it funny, it’s an awesome tutorial for video contest filmmakers who need to increase their view counts in view-based contests!

In his e-mail, the guy said that Doritos initially rejected his video because it contained unauthorized music.  But he didn’t use any music, just chip bag sounds.  So he missed out on a week of exposure.  There are still 5 days left in the contest so if you want to help this guy in his quest for Viralocity, visit his page on the Doritos’ site and facebook and tweet him and link him and stuff:  http://bit.ly/bjjyT0

I also got an update from the guy who made the for-charity, Viralocity video. (check my last post for the full story)  He said his entry has started to creep up the rankings so if you want to support a good cause, go spread this video:  http://bit.ly/djGMqG

Doritos’ OTHER video contest headed for a bad end

viralocity

Poor Canada.  Those chip-loving hosers weren’t eligible to participate in Dorito’s Crash the Superbowl commercial contest.  But now that CTSB is over, Fritolay decided that our neighbors to the north deserved a contest of their own.  So they launched a new video contest, “Doritos Viralocity,” just for them.

The premise of “Viralocity” is pretty neat but the execution is just….whoa, kinda nuts.  Doritos released a new, un-named flavor of chips in Canada and asked the public to name it.  Entrants were supposed to shoot a video that shows why the new flavor should get their suggested name.  Like I said, it’s a cool idea.

If I were eligible to enter, I'd have called them "Beardy's Choice"

But considering how well-executed the Crash the Superbowl contest was, “Viralocity” is just plain crazy and confusing.  The winner of the contest and the recipient of the $100,000 (CD) grand prize will be the video that goes the most viral.  Doritos has a whole system of points set up to measure viralness.  For example, every time a Canadian views an entry, that entry gets 5 points.  But if someone outside Canada watches an entry, it gets 100 points.  And each time it gets facebooked or tweeted or Dugg, different points are awarded.  Some accomplishments can get you as many as 1,000 points.  If you’re interested in the specifics, click here to see the full breakdown.

So what’s wrong with this system?  Well for one, it’s basically just a giant online free-for-all.  There’s no way Doritos could ever track all those views and clicks and posts so if someone really wanted to inflate their video’s score, it’d be very easy.

But worse than that though, it seems like the contest was almost intentionally designed to pick a terrible, horrible winner.  Anyone who knows how the internet works could tell you that this contest is going to be won by some annoying guy with an idiotic show on youtube that’s super-popular with tweens and his video would some how be related to something those tweens really, really love.  Like, I dunno…Twilight or something.  There are still 10 days to go before the final scores are tallied but right now, it looks like this video, with a score of 1,852,667 points will probably wind up being the winner:

I knew the most “popular” video wouldn’t be very good but I never expected it to be straight up racist!  Yeah the guy in the video is asian but that doesn’t mean it’s no big deal if he runs around mocking Chinese people.  If that video wins, is Doritos really going to want to associate themselves with such an offensive caricature?

As expected, this dude who made that video has a very, very, very popular youtube channel and his “show” is just one big joke about negative Asian stereotypes.  In fact, this guy’s channel is so popular that his other entry in the contest is now ranked #3.  If his videos were awesome this wouldn’t bother me but both entries are lame and the flavor names he picked have no relation to the videos.  And it sorta seemed like that was the point of the contest.  The only reason this dude is going to win is because he has a big social network.  That means that every single filmmaker that actually tried to make a decent entry for this contest wasted their time.

Doritos should have seen this coming a mile away.  When you let the internet decide what’s popular, you’re gonna wind up with some pretty lame, offensive, lowest-common-denominator type stuff.

And trust me, this guy IS probably going to win.  The Viralocity website is set-up in such a way that you can see the most-popular videos.  Since the Asian-bashing Twilight spoof is ranked #1, everyone is going to click it out of curiosity….and that of course keeps jacking the video’s score higher and higher.

It looks like Doritos managed to get a whopping 1,200 entries for this contest.  If you’d like to sort through them, here’s the video gallery:  http://www.doritosviralocity.ca/Gallery.aspx

Cheaters CAN prosper!

twirl

Temptation, thy name is TwirlTV. For the last few days I have been wrestling with an ethical dilemma. To force myself to do the right thing I’ll blog about my mildly-evil plan rather than carry it out.

I don’t know what Twirl TV is. Some type of Hulu thing maybe? Who cares? Point is they’re holding a video contest that seems designed to reward cheaters. The idea is that you make a 15 or 30 second promo for, or a 3 minute parody of, your favorite TV show. Then you upload the thing to youtube and forward the link to Twirl TV within 6 hours of the upload time so they can keep track of it.

Now, here’s the BS part: Whichever video has the highest VIEW COUNT by October 16th wins $1,000.

Can you believe that? What is the friggin’ point!? It is so easy to increase your view count on youtube it’s embarrassing. Obviously you can just sit at your computer hitting the play button over and over but with the help of a very basic add-on to your internet browser you can race to the top of any “highest view count wins” contest in no time at all. Because I couldn’t believe the rules of this contest I wrote the organizers. Here is the e-mail I sent them:

“I have a question about the Twirl TV video contest. I wanted to enter but I saw that the winning video will be the one with the highest view count on youtube. Getting a high view count on youtube is very, very easy. You just need to know a few super easy computer tricks and you can automatically rack up views. How are you guys going to ensure that a cheater doesn’t win the contest? I’d hate to spend my time shooting a video only to find out some guy with an auto-refresher won by a landslide.”

And here is the actual response I got from Twirl TV:

“Thank you for you interest in our contest. We understand the possible use of automatic refreshers and developed a judging prize that is equal in value. The judging panel will consist of a TV producer and two of our top two Twirl TV users. We look forward to seeing your video and i will gladly answer any additional questions.”

-contest@twirltv.com

Translation: We know and we don’t care. The people behind this contest understand that this “view count” race is going to be won by a cheater. They’re also giving away a $1,000 video camera to the video they like best so who cares about the view count contest? I do, that’s who. This is just total and complete laziness on the part of the organizers of this contest. Oh, laziness and stupidity.  A “highest view count wins” contest could only be dreamed up by people who have no clue how the internet works these days. These type of people keep hearing about Twitter and yotube and Digg and facebook and they feel the need to jump on the viral video/social networking bandwagon even though they don’t know where the bandwagon is going or why.

At some point, the marketing people who came up with this contest had to explain it to the tech people who were supposed to set it up. I’m a tech guy and I’ve had to deal with marketing people before and some of them can be really thick-headed. They are “idea people” who get tunnel vision when they think they have an ingenious plan. Maybe some IT nerd tried to speak up and suggest how easy it would be for someone to get an artificially high view count. But the marketing people didn’t care. As long as it LOOKED like a lot of people had watched these promos then they could tell their bosses that the contest was a huge success. “We’re happy to report that the video contest entries had a combined view count of over 200,000!” they’ll say. “That means we exposed our brand to 200,000 people and only spent $2,000. Look how awesome at marking we are!”

After I got the e-mail back from Twirl TV I honestly thought good and hard about entering and then doing the things it would take for me to ensure a win. There are still 8 days to go in the contest and right now the most viewed video in the competition only has 1,700 views. Pffffft. I could shoot and upload a video today and have 1,700 “views” by midnight. But I’ve decided that $1,000 just isn’t worth the guilt I’d feel.

However….that guilt wouldn’t extend beyond my own head.  If I were to upload a video for this contest and then auto-refresh myself to a view count victory I would technically not be cheating.  BECAUSE THE RULES OF THE CONTEST DO NOT PROHIBIT SUCH ACTIVITY.  There’s no way that Twirl TV could ever track which IP addresses your video’s views came from but even if they could, replaying your own video over and over is not against the rules.  So if you’re in the mood to make an easy $1,000 go knock your self out.

Challenge, Create, Change and then vote like crazy!

target_converse

Earlier this summer, Converse and Target teamed up to hold the “Challenge, Create, Change” video contest. Participants were supposed to “Demonstrate how they are challenging, creating or changing something in their worlds.” Filmmakers could submit comedies, documentaries, short films, animations or “anything in between.”

The prizes were pretty big: Grand Prize would get you Ten Grand, a trip for two to the Wanderlust Festival in Lake Tahoe and a thousand dollar Target gift card. 1st place was good for five grand and a trip to Wanderlust and 2nd place got two grand and the trip.

In all, Converse and Target got more than 450 entries! That is a TON! This should be a lesson to all those video contest organizers who wind up frustrated and disappointed that they only get 6 crappy entries. If you offer some great prizes, people will come out of the woodwork to make videos for you.

So Converse/Target were smart about how to lure in filmmakers but then they blew it when it came time to picking the winner. All top three videos were selected by YOUTUBE VOTES. Uck. When they say “Winners will be selected by the youtube audience” that really means “Whoever wants to waste the most time creating fake youtube accounts so you can vote over and over gets 10 grand.”

The videos that went on to win are….OK. They aren’t obscenely bad but they aren’t insanely awesome either. They are just….ok. The third one at least has some cool special effects but basically all three of the winning videos are pretty darn boring. They are long as hell too. Anyway, here’s another lesson to video contest organizers; if you let “people” on youtube alone pick the winners in your contest, here’s the type of results you can expect:

Grand prize. $10,000:

1st Place.  $5,000:

2nd Place.  $2,000:

To be fair, it seems like converse/target first selected a group of finalists that youtubers could vote on but any time you leave the final decision up to “voters” the winners will always be the people who either have a huge social network to rely on or who are the best at stuffing the ballot box without getting caught.

The other finalists and all the other submitted videos can be seen here: http://www.youtube.com/user/ConverseOneStar

Designed by: Free Cell Phones | Thanks to Highest CD Rates, Domain Registration and Registry Software