. Doritos | Video Contest News - Everything you ever wanted to know about Video Contest plus some stuff that you probalbly won't care about unless you're a total film geek Doritos : Video Contest News – Everything you ever wanted to know about Video Contest plus some stuff that you probalbly won't care about unless you're a total film geek

Posts Tagged ‘Doritos’

Doritos says their Crash the Super Bowl facebook app was actually a huge success

Call me crazy but I think Frito-Lay’s PR department might have pitched a story idea to AdWeek as a response to an article I wrote just before the Super Bowl.  On January 29th I posted this friendly critique of Doritos’ new Crash the Super Bowl facebook app: Did a poorly-designed Facebook app almost ruin this year’s Crash the Super Bowl contest?

Here’s the TL;DR version of that article: Doritos’ new CTSB app suuuucked.  Only 12 videos would load at a time so watching multiple entries was a complete hassle.  (The old CSTB video galley was incredibly user-friendly.  It was hosted on a dedicated website and hundreds of video thumbnails would load at a time.)  The facebook app was also a spammy privacy killer.  If you allowed the app, your facebook friends were bombarded with updates about your CTSB activities.  I thought that I had selected the “Only Me” option but Doritos kept posting junk about me and I didn’t even realize it.

The was the first year that FritoLay ran The Crash on facebook.  Coincidentally, it was also the first year that FritoLay saw a decrease in the number of entries they received.  The 2011-2012 installment of the CTSB contest netted about 6,000 submissions.  I did a quick and dirty count and this year it looks like fewer than 3,000 entries were uploaded.  The prizes and rules were about the same so I blamed this 50% drop in participation on the crappy facebook app.  Since fans weren’t able to watch a ton of low-quality entries, they weren’t inspired to go out and shoot better commercials of their own.

About a week after I posted my story, AdWeek ran their own article about the Crash the Super Bowl facebook app:  Frito-Lay Likes the Data From Doritos’ Crash the Super Bowl: Facebook-anchored effort hits 100 million views  Have you ever read an article that breaks down the performance data of a Facebook app?  Yeah, me either.  I don’t think anyone at AdWeek would notice or care that The Crash had moved to Facebook.  So someone on FritoLay’s PR team probably contacted a journalist-friend and pitched a positive story about the app to counter the bad press they had received (i.e., that brilliant a-hole Beardy’s story on VideoContestNews.com).

Here are the first few paragraphs of the AdWeek story:

Doritos’ decision to move its seventh annual “Crash the Super Bowl” campaign to Facebook proved to be a winner. The Frito-Lay brand—which had anchored the effort on a microsite in years past—drew nearly 100 million views for the five finalist videos in the user-generated contest, breaking its record.

“Almost every single metric of the program exceeded what we achieved during the last six years,” Ram Krishnan, vp of marketing at Frito-Lay, told Adweek. Krishnan said Facebook’s social nature helped the videos go viral. “That’s the whole reason why we switched,” he said. “People like to talk about the videos, and that reaches their circle of friends.”

What’s more, visits to its Facebook app page were up 100 percent compared to last year on the microsite, said Dena von Werssowetz, Frito-Lay marketing manager. Doritos’ Facebook fans increased substantially, von Werssowetz suggested, eclipsing the 4 million mark for the first time on the social site.

Her brand ran the full gamut of Facebook ads—Reach Block, Marketplace, Sponsored Stories and Promoted Posts—to drive interest in the “Crash” initiative. (A spend figure wasn’t disclosed.) Around 3,500 videos were submitted from Oct. 8 through Nov. 16, 2012, via the brand’s Facebook app.

Her brand ran the full gamut of Facebook ads—Reach Block, Marketplace, Sponsored Stories and Promoted Posts—to drive interest in the “Crash” initiative. (A spend figure wasn’t disclosed.) Around 3,500 videos were submitted from Oct. 8 through Nov. 16, 2012, via the brand’s Facebook app.

I’m pretty sure this article was the first time that FritoLay revealed how many entries were submitted this year.  Like I said, I did a quick count and I only saw about 2,800 videos; and that’s the number I published in my original article.  3,500 just sounds way too high and I have a feeling that Doritos may have tweaked their finally tally a bit.  Maybe the official figure includes duplicate entries that didn’t appear in the facebook gallery…or maybe I’m just bad at counting, I don’t know.

So anyway, the new CTSB facebook app didn’t suck….at least from a marketing standpoint.  It did what it was supposed to do; it generated tons and tons and tons of free publicity for Doritos.  100 million views sounds like a ridiculously amazing accomplishment but these “views” aren’t really VIEWS.  They are impressions.  If you voted for one of the Crash the Super Bowl finalists, your facebook friends would see an alert in their news feed.  If one of your friends scrolled past that alert,  that counted as a “view.”  So I’m guessing that most of these views were just junk traffic.   But even if it wasn’t, a ton of free hits isn’t worth it if you annoy and inconvenience your target audience.  The goal of the CTSB contest is to find great Doritos commercials.  Are 100 million, 2-second long casual facebook views really worth it if the contest also experiences a 45% to 60% drop in the number of entries that are uploaded?

The AdWeek article is short and worth a read.  But you’re probably feelin’ lazy today so I’ll just copy and paste one more bit of interesting info:

And it sounds likely that Doritos will run the “Crash” initiative again next year. “This is the best amplification of our brand narrative,” Klein said. “We just continue to be blown away by the creativity of Doritos fans.”

FritoLay probably wouldn’t let AdWeek run this line if they had any doubt about the future of the contest.  So I think there almost certainly will be a 2013-2014 installment of the Crash the Super Bowl contest.
 

Big Winners: The SmallHD Story

Here’s an interesting short(ish) documentary about a team of friends from North Carolina who have managed to win Doritos’ Crash the Super Bowl contest twice.  Actually, these guys have made the finals three times in total and they even got into the Top 5 twice in one year! Their ad, Underdog wound up being ranked the #2 commercial of the 2010 Super Bowl so they won a bonus of $600,000.  I personally would have re-invested that money in lottery tickets but N.C. crew used their winnings to expand their field monitor company, SmallHD.
 


 

Goat 4 Sale wins the Nielson Super Bowl Ad Survey

Ahhhh!

Just before the Super Bowl I proclaimed that if the Crash the Super Bowl ad Goat 4 Sale didn’t win 1st place in the USA Today Ad Meter poll, I’d eat a tin can.  Well, Goat 4 Sale did air during the game but it came in 7th.  I was going to keep my word and eat a tin can but my doctor gave me a note saying I didn’t have to do it because I guess eating metal will kill you.  Apparently it will also kill a goat.  My doctor explained that goats got the reputation as can-eaters because they are sometimes seen eating the paper labels off of old cans.  So my doctor gave me a Campbell’s soup label and he made me eat it in front of him.  My doctor’s a dick.

As I explained in my previous post, the results of this year’s ad meter totally took me by surprise.  I knew that USA Today was going to “open it up to the public” but I could have sworn that they were also doing their traditional focus group thing.  But nope, public votes alone determined the results of this year’s poll.  And that pretty much explains why the results of this year’s poll were so ridiculous.  I’m positive that if USA Today had done focus group testing like they used to, at least one Doritos filmmaker would have made the Top 3.  Actually, if the ad meter hadn’t changed this year I’m pretty sure the results would have been pretty similar to Nielson’s Super Bowl ad survey.  Nielson released the results of that poll the other day and Goat 4 Sale was ranked the #1 most liked commercial of the game as well as the #1 most memorable commercial of the game.  Here’s Nielson’s full top 10:

-

This list makes a lot more sense than USA Today’s top 10.  Goat 4 Sale totally blew away the competition.  Here’s how Nielson got these numbers:

All Super Bowl ads were ranked on likability. The Likability Index was calculated by taking the likability score (percent of viewers who liked the ad) and indexing versus the mean likability score of all 2013 Super Bowl ads. For example, with a Likability Index of 221, the Doritos ad has proven to be 2.21 times as likable as the average 2013 Super Bowl ad.

Notes: The Top 10 lists are based on about 6,750 ad surveys of Super Bowl viewers; 67 unique national creative executions (excluding movie spots) during the game’s four quarters and halftime were considered for the list.

So in the USA Today poll, anybody from anywhere could vote on the ads.  They didn’t have to rate every commercial and a lot of people voted before the Doritos ads were even revealed.  In the Nielson survey, it sounds like the viewers were pre-screened and they had to vote on every single ad.  That’s the right way to do a poll like this.  Winning the Nielson survey is a major accomplishment and it’s a shame that there’s no bonus prize money for winning this poll.  Now that the old ad meter has been ruined, maybe next year FritoLay should dump USA Today and forge a new partnership with Nielson.
 

Why didn’t Doritos’ Crash the Super Bowl ads do better on this year’s USA Today Ad meter?

Late last night, USA Today released the full results of the 2013 Super Bowl ad meter poll and there was great news for Doritos fans; The Crash the Super Bowl winners Fasionista Daddy and Goat 4 Sale were ranked the #1 and #2 :30 second commercials of the game!  Unfortunately, the ad meter poll included every commercial that aired during the Super Bowl, even the 2 minute long short film/ad things.  So Fashionista Daddy actually came in 4th and Goat 4 Sale came in 7th.  Here is the official Top 10 from USA Today:

-

Because neither Doritos commercial made the Top 3, the winning filmmakers won’t receive any bonus money from FritoLay.  And that is a goddamn shame.  The two guys who won the Crash the Super Bowl contest this year were completely and totally robbed.  If USA Today hadn’t changed their methods and wrecked their ad meter this year I am positive that at least one Doritos finalist would have won a six or seven figure bonus.

For 24 Super Bowls in a row, USA Today conducted their ad meter poll in exact same way.  Here’s how USA Today described the process:

It was pretty simple: We’d bring in 300 or so pre-screened viewers to watch the game at several locations. The panelists were enticed with a small payment, a giant theater-sized screen, a knob-turning device and thick sandwiches to record their impressions of the commercials from start to finish.  

“They were into both the game and the ads,” recalls editor Fred Meier, who helped honcho the project from the start. “We could tell from the crowd reaction how high an ad was going to score. And we never wanted to hear them guffawing late in the third or in the fourth quarter, which would mean a potential late new leader in the ad contest.”

So the old Ad Meter poll was a highly organized live event.  The USA Today team had people turn little dials to indicate how much they liked or disliked a commercial as it aired.  People watched the ads in real time and they only got to see them once.  They didn’t give each commercial an individual score.  Instead, a computer averaged out their dial activty.  So commercials that were exciting or funny from beginning to end always did very well.  FritoLay noticed that Crash the Super Bowl ads were actually scoring very high on the ad meter so in the fall of 2008 they offered some bonus prizes to any filmmaker who could crack the top 3.  1st place on the ad meter would get you a million dollar bonus, 2nd was good for $600K and 3rd got you $400K. Filmmakers studied the mechanics of the USA Today ad meter and they started crafting ads that would theoretically score very well in a dial-measured style focus group test.  And that plan actually paid off for a few lucky filmmakers.  At least one Crash the Super Bowl ad managed to make the Top 3 every year since 2009.  And Doritos commercials actually won the ad meter poll in 2009, 2011 and 2012.

But for the first time in 5 years, Doritos didn’t even crack the Top 3.  Actually, 2013 was a bad year for ALL the funny 30 second Super Bowl ads.  The top 10 was dominated by 60 and even 120 second(!) long sentimental or lighthearted  “cute” commercials about farmers and families that were narrated by Oprah and the ghost of Paul Harvey.

So what the heck happened?  Well it turns out that this year USA Today decided to throw their 25 year old ad meter experiment into the garbage and then they replaced the whole thing with a B.S. online poll.  Again, here’s a quote from the folks at USA Today:

In an attempt to make the Ad Meter more social, we partnered with Facebook last year, which worked out fine except it was a bit confusing to mix the panel reactions with the later Facebook results.

So this year (the 25th Annual Ad Meter!), we’ve gone totally digital, dropping the live panels and Facebook, and instead offering everyone in America the chance to sign up online and vote from their computers.

So basically the paper kept the name of the project and got rid of everything that cost them any money….and anything that gave the poll any credibility. Here are three big changes that wound up skewing the ad meter results in unexpected ways:

1.  Anybody could vote.  Instead of a few hundred participants watching each ad in a closed and controlled screening room, any random person with a web connection could vote and affect the outcome of the poll.  In total, about 7,000 people across the US voted for some or all of the ads in the poll.

2.  Viewers did not have to rate every commercial.  This was an enormous and very important change.  Voting in the online poll was actually launched BEFORE the game even started.  But the Doritos ads didn’t appear until after they aired because Doritos wanted to keep the winners a secret.  So if you voted early, you didn’t even see the Crash the Super Bowl ads.

3.  The ad meter voters were not pre-screened.  When a company wins the ad meter they get millions of dollars worth of free publicity since their commercial is shown over and over and over online and on the news.  So is it really so far-fetched to suspect that maybe some companies just hired people (or asked their employees) to give their Super Bowl commercial a high score?  As I said, only about 7,000 people voted in the online poll this year.  What if a giant billion-dollar, multinational corporation like Proctor and Gamble had sent a mass e-mail to all of their 129,000 employees asking them to sign up and vote for Tide’s Super Bowl commercial?  Even if only 500 people out of that 129,000 voted they would still have a massive impact on that commercial’s score.

4.  No more dials.  People at home don’t have dials hooked up to their computers.  So instead of rating an ad second-by-second, viewers gave each commercial an over all score on a scale of 1 to 10.  The old poll measured a participant’s instant and immediate reaction to an ad.  But the new poll gave people time to think about how much they liked each commercial.  I suspect this had an odd psychological affect on some people.  If I saw a commercial were a guy got hit in the balls I might chuckle…but then I’d feel kind of like a moron for laughing at something so low-brow.  So I suspect a lot of ad meter participants took a moment to decide how they should react to each ad rather than give an honest assessment of their actual reaction.  If Tide’s 60-second long “Miracle Stain” spot had run last year, I don’t think it would have come in 2nd on the ad meter.  That’s because it started off slowly and I think a lot of people would have been bored after 40 seconds.  But this year people watched the ad from start to finish before they made any judgments.  I think viewers decided it was cute and funny and that it was the “right kind” of ad.  I think this is the reason all these sentimental ads did so well last night.  It just felt good to give them high scores.  The commercials maybe weren’t entertaining but viewers subconsciously wanted to demonstrate that they had good taste.  So a wacky chip ad staring  a guy in a dress gets a 7 but an inspiring (but sort of confusing) Oprah-narrated ad about families deserved to get a 10 because that was a serious and maybe even an important commercial.

So the USA Today ad meter is dead and it’s never coming back.  Sure, the folks at USA Today are going to continue to parade around its corpse like it’s still real and relevant but it’s not.  In fact, USA Today apparently wants to bastardize their brand even further by running ad meter polls during other events like the Oscars. (The fact that companies don’t make special commercials for the Oscars or the All-Star game apparently doesn’t mater.)  So in the end, this just comes down to an issue of money and free publicity.  USA Today realized that the Ad Meter name was worth something so they’ve decided to make a couple bucks by running shitty online polls under the once respected Ad Meter banner.

I’m not really sure what all this means for the Crash the Super Bowl contest but I’ll be frank, I’m a little worried.  It will now be much, much harder for Dortios commercials to score a #1, #2 or #3 spot in the poll.  That means FritoLay will be getting a lot less exposure and free press out of The Crash.  I suspect that FritoLay will run the contest again next year but I also suspect they might change the terms a bit.  I really think it’s time for Doritos to start paying bonus prizes to the finalists if their ad makes it to air regardless of how they do on the ad meter.  They could still do the bonus ad meter prizes but if they guaranteed an extra $25,000 just for airing that’d be really nice.  I know that might sound like a lot of money but it’s chump change when you consider the fact that FritoLay has to pay at least  $3,000,000 to air one 30 second Super Bowl commercial.
 

The winners of the 2013 Crash the Super Bowl contest are: Goat 4 Sale and Fashionista Daddy!

A twitpic of the Crash the Super Bowl finalists just before kick off.  Via @DoritosUSA

The Super Bowl STILL isn’t over but this year’s installment of the Crash the Super Bowl contest is.  As promised, two consumer-made ads aired tonight and the winners were Goat 4 Sale and Fashionista Daddy!  In case you missed them, here they are again:

.

I really though “Road Chip” was going to make it but I’m glad Doritos finally gave the whole dog thing a rest.  As for the USA Today ad meter, we won’t know the results until late tonight.  Most of the commercials that have aired so far have been simply god awful so I think both Doritos ads could wind up in the top 3.  I think the only other serious contender for the #1 spot is the Budweiser “Clydesdale” ad.  That one was pretty damn great.  We’ll post the ad meter results as soon as we get them so check back here in the A.M.

Another twitpic from @DoritosUSA. Here’s the director of Goat 4 Sale, Ben Callner the moment he saw his commercial air.

 11:50PM UPDATE:  USA Today just published a story that contained a few ad meter results.  Unfortunately, neither Crash the Super Bowl ad landed in the Top 3 so nobody won any of the bonus prizes.  The #1 ad of the game was Budweiser’s Clydesdale.  The highest ranking Dortios ad was Fashionista Daddy which came in at #4.  No word on how Goat 4 Sale did yet.  These results are really quite shocking.  It sounds like many of the most popular ads of the night were sentimental instead of funny.  I think both of the Doritos directors got screwed really hard by the changes that USA Today made to the ad meter poll this year.  For the first time ever, the ad meter was open to the public.  (It used to be just based on focus group polling.)  More than 7,000 people signed up and rated ads and who the hell knows who those 7,000 people were?  If the ad meter hadn’t changed this year I’m positive the outcome would have been very different.  I’ll post a more complete recap tomorrow after the full results appear online.

 

Which Crash the Super Bowl ads will air tonight?

Tonight is the Super Bowl!  Aren’t you excited?!  Yeah, me neither.  I’m one of those pretentious assholes who only watches the game for the commercials.  Apparently the San Francisco 49ers are playing the Baltimore Ravens?  Man, I don’t know who to root for.  On one hand I think ravens are super cool and spooky and it’s awesome that Baltimore actually named a pro sports team in honor of an Edgar Allen Poe Poem.  (Whoa…you can’t spell “Poem” without “Poe.”  Trippy.)  But I guess I’m hoping San Fransisco will win since San Francisco is the greatest city in america…after Chicago of course.  And I guess some dude on the Ravens is a straight up murderer or something?  Oh well, like I said I just care about the commercials, specifically, the Doritos commercials.

Once again we’re at the end of another installment of the Crash the Super Bowl contest.  Tonight, two fan-made Doritos ads are going to be aired during the game.  One will be the commercial that won the public vote and the other will be selected by a panel of judges from FritoLay.  So in less than 12 hours we’ll know who won this contest.

But why wait?!  History has shown that it’s actually pretty easy to predict the results of The Crash.  The entry that wins the popular vote is usually the one that gets the most views and positive media attention.  Since the voting is taking place on facebook, let’s check the facebook view counts of all 5 finalists.  These were the view counts from January 29th which was the last day of voting:

FACEBOOK VIEW COUNTS:

Goat 4 Sale:  1,216,333
Fashionista Daddy:  1,002,366
Road Chip:  923,630
Fetch:  805,179
Express Checkout:  777,475

If people are actually voting after they watch an entry the winner by a mile will be Goat 4 Sale.  It’s just blowing everyone else away.  And that ad is also blowing everyone away when it comes to media coverage.  I have a google alert set for “Crash the Super Bowl” and I can tell you that Goat 4 Sale has probably been getting more media coverage than all the other entries COMBINED.  So I think it’s a slam dunk that Goat 4 Sale will win the online vote and air during the big game.

That means the big mystery here is who will come in second.  I’ve noticed that the ads that air are always the most popular ones.  Doritos doesn’t offer the Million Dollar Ad Meter prize just for fun.  THE REALLY LOVE GIVING THAT MONEY AWAY.  Every time a fan-made Doritos commercial wins a top spot on the ad meter, Doritos gets a ton of free publicity.  So the judges at FriotLay always chose to air ads that they think people will love.

That means that Fetch and Express Checkout are probably out of the running.  They’re good commercials but they’re not the kind of Super Bowl ads that people would love. Plus as we can see from the view count numbers, they haven’t really caught on.  So the race for 2nd place comes down to Fasionista Daddy and Road Chip.  Fashionista Daddy got about 100,000 more views but Road Chip was created by 2 directors who have literally made the CTSB finals 4 times. now  They understand how to get out the vote and they also were able to get a lot more press coverage.  So it’s looking like a close race.  Doritos will want to select an ad that has the potential to go viral on youtube after the game.  So as I tie-breaker let’s take a look at the view counts of the 5 finalists on youtube:

Youtube view counts as of January 30th. (disregard Betty White)

Yo WTF!?  Road Chip is CRUSHING all the other finalists, even Goat 4 Sale?  That’s kind of shocking.  The lopsided results of the unofficial view count race probably mean that the FritoLay is going to air Road Chip during the Super Bowl.  Road Chip got twice as many views as Fashinista Daddy so this decision is pretty much a no-brainer.

But even if Doritos doesn’t care about youtube views, I think they would still pick Road Chip for one simple reason; it has a dog in it.  For 3 years in a row Doritos has aired at least one fan-made commercial that featured a dog.  And those dog-themed ads have always kicked ass on the USA Today Ad meter.  So I just don’t think there is any chance that Doritos will break with tradition and not air a dog-themed ad.  Also, as I said, the 2 directors that made Road Chip have literally created 4 commercials in the last 3 years that went on to make the Crash the Super Bowl finals.  But they have never once won any of the bonus prizes.  The CTSB judges seem to be a sentimental lot and sometimes it seems they make their picks because they want to see certain contestants succeed.  So I think the Road Chip team has a serious sentimental edge in this race.

A few final predictions:  If Goat 4 Sale airs it’s going to be ranked the #1 commercial of the game and the ad’s director will win the million dollar bonus.  If the Moose the Goat (the star of Goat 4 Sale) isn’t on the front page of Monday’s edition of USA Today I’ll eat a tin can.  If Road Chip airs I think it will land somewhere in the top 6.  There’s some tough competition this year but it could maybe get the #3 spot.  Sometimes Doritos chooses to air bonus CTSB ads but I don’t think that’s going to happen tonight.  A lot of companies have decided to run 60 second ads this year which means there were fewer slots available.  Plus the ones that were available cost 3.8 million dollars each!  So I think the days where Doritos would air an “extra” Crash the Super Bowl ad are behind us.

We’ll have the final results of the 2013 Crash the Super Bowl contest for you as soon as they’re in so be sure to check back here after the game.
 

Did a poorly-designed Facebook app almost ruin this year’s Crash the Super Bowl contest?

Facebook: Ruining every nice thing on the Internet since 2004

Doritos’ Crash the Super Bowl contest might just be the biggest and most successful promotion in the history of advertising.  There have been seven different installments of The Crash and until now, each one has been bigger and better than the last.  But this year something strange happened; for the first time ever the Crash saw a drop in the number of ads that were submitted.   Doritos received about 2,800 entries last fall and although that’s an amazing figure, in 2011 the company received more than 6,000 entries.  The terms of the contest changed very little and there is still a million dollars at stake…so what could have caused a 50% drop in the number of videos that were submitted?  What the heck happened to this year’s Crash the Super Bowl contest!?

Facebook.  Facebook is what happened.

The first six installments of The Crash were all hosted on the dedicated website, Crashthesuperbowl.com.  The site was brilliantly designed and it was the perfect home for the contest.  It was fun, user-friendly and it always worked just the way it was supposed to.  Crashthesuperbowl.com became an important part of the contest and I think it really helped generate a lot of excitement among the fans.  There was a huge and pretty active forum that filmmakers could use to ask questions so it felt very live and interactive. The site also had some nice privacy protections.  If you wanted to upload an entry or rate or comment on other people’s submissions you had to create a username and register an account.  Your profile and contact info were hidden from the public so no one knew who the heck ChipMonster23 or OrangeDustAddict were in he real world.  This did lead to a little trolling but a few rotten apples posting dumb comments on popular videos didn’t do much harm.

By far the the greatest feature of the old Crashthesuperbowl.com was the site’s video gallery.  IT WAS PHENOMENAL. When you went to the gallery you would see thumbnails for about 200 entries. If you scrolled left or right, more thumbnails would automatically load. So even if there were 6,000 submissions, you could scan through all of them by just pushing your cursor to the right. Here’s what the old gallery looked like:

RIP: Crashthesuperbowl.com

I think this video gallery was one of the biggest reasons the contest got so huge.  FritoLay made it incredibly easy for users to watch lots and lots of entries.  You could skim though the gallery and click on any random video that caught your eye.  So people who were thinking about entering the contest could sit down and check out the competition with ease.  And here’s the thing about the Crash the Super Bowl contest; maybe 90% of the entries are pretty terrible!  I know that might sound harsh but it’s true.  The vast majority of submissions are made by amateur filmmakers who don’t really understand how to craft a tight, funny, clever, 30 second commercial.  So if you were thinking of entering and if you watched a few dozen (or a few hundred) entries you would catch on to this fact pretty quickly.  And this would lead to a crucial realization:  I CAN DO BETTER THAN THAT!  The video gallery made it look like any half-decent ad that didn’t have any glaring technical problems would be a serious contender. And that perception probably inspired thousands of filmmakers to go out and shoot their own submissions.

So Crashthesuperbowl.com was awesome.  But it did lack one key feature; it wasn’t very SOCIAL.  All of those ratings and comments and shares were TRAPPED inside the Crash the Super Bowl website.  So I’m guessing that some very clever person at FritoLay or Goodby, Silverstein & partners (that ad agency that helps run the Crash) realized that if the contest was moved to Facebook, literally MILLIONS of people would be exposed to activty related to the contest.

And that’s how everything got all f#&%ed up.  Last fall FritoLay decided that it was time to cash in on all those ratings and uploads and comments so they mothballed their amazing website and turned their entire multimillion dollar ad contest into a lousy facebook app.  Suddenly the contest went from being a fun, user-friendly experience to a big ass annoying, privacy killing social media monstrosity.  I want you to scroll up and look at that screen grab of the old CTSB video gallery.  Then scroll down and look at the new FACEBOOK video gallery:

The CTSB Facebook app

See that WATCH MORE ADS button?  I think that little button nearly ruined the 2013 Crash the Super Bowl contest.  On the old site you could skim through hundreds of ads in a matter of seconds.  But the new facebook app would only show you 12 ENTRIES AT A TIME.  If you wanted to see more thumbnails you had to click the button and wait a few seconds(!) for 12 more to load.  It was incredibly annoying.  Every year I try and watch as many Crash the Super Bowl entries as possible.  I used to go though the gallery and click on any ad that happened to catch my eye.  But not this year.  This year I tried to watch some entries but I quickly got frustrated and gave up.  And you know what?  Not being able to watch tons of other entries totally killed my enthusiasm for this contest.  I tried shooting a submission of my own but when I ran into a problem I just said “screw it” and gave up.  I just didn’t care this year and I know it’s because I wasn’t able to get psyched up and inspired by other people’s entries.

But the crappy video gallery wasn’t the app’s only problem.  The Crash the Super Bowl app was also a vicious privacy killer.  In fact, it might be the most invasive and dangerous contest app I’ve ever seen.  Contestants had to submit their entries under their real names and their names would automatically appear next to their videos.  Those names were clickable and they linked to the director’s facebook page.  So if you had a popular video, a million strangers could easily see anything you had ever publicly posted on facebook.  Oh and guess what, if you listed the names of your crew members their names would also appear next to your video and their names were clickable too.  Here, check out this shot of one the 5 finalist ads:

-

Every one of the names under the comment box is clickable.  Out of the 925,970 people that have watched this video, I wonder how many of them clicked on those links just for the hell of it.  I looked at one of the producer’s profiles and in 60 seconds I knew where she lives, what she looks like, where she works, where she went to school, who her boyfriend is, and how old she is.  It’s absurd that contestants and their crew members have to be exposed like this.  But the contestants aren’t the only one’s who need to worry.  You can also check out the facebook page of anyone who comments on any entry.  Most of the finalists and their crew probably realized that they should set their facebook pages to ultra-private mode but do all these people who have been leaving comments know that hundreds of thousands of strangers can see their personal info in just one click?

But wait, there’s more!  I haven’t even gotten to the WORST thing about this app; it is just a gigantic, spam-spewing monster!  Every single time a facebook user votes for an entry or leaves a comment, a message like this pops up in their friends’ news feeds:

-

I took this screenshot after I voted for a friend’s entry in the Nacho Average Awards phase of the contest. (If you’re not familiar with “The Nachos” they were kind of an honorable mention prize and the filmmakers that got the most vote won a year’s supply of Doritos.)  I voted for that entry every day and every freaking day my friends would have to see that alert.   The same thing happens when you vote for a finalist commercial.  I’ve been voting for the finalist “Goat 4 Sale” all month.  Here’s what would appear on my timeline every time I voted:

-

I’ve used a lot of contest apps before and normally I would just delete that piece of activity and the post would disappear.  But deleting that post doesn’t actually remove it from your news feed.  So for days I thought I was removing the post but my friends were still seeing it.  When I accepted the app it actually asked “Who can see posts this app makes on your facebook timeline?“  I thought I selected the “ONLY ME” option but when I checked later it was set to “FRIENDS.”  I don’t know if I just screwed up or if something was wrong with the app but I’ll tell you this, whenever I accept an app I ALWAYS set it to “ONLY ME.”  But really, isn’t it dumb that I even have to care about this kind of stuff?  Can’t I just cast a vote and be on my way?  Isn’t enough that I’m voluntarily watching a commercial?  Does FritoLay really need to commercialize my commercial-watching?

I know that PR teams and ad agencies are being told that they need to “make things more social” by big wigs who have no idea what that actually means.  But how does any of this junk actually help sell Doritos?  Does anyone at FritoLay really believe that my Uncle Tony is going to go out and buy a bag of Cool Ranch chips because he saw a brief mention of Doritos in his facebook news feed?  I mean seriously…..the Crash the Super Bowl ads that win this contest are going to be broadcast during the Super Bowl which means they’ll be seen by 100 million people.  Isn’t that enough exposure??  Does FritoLay really need to shove their content into the eyeballs of my 262 facebook friends?

That daily dose of spam was really annoying and if I wasn’t a giant video contest nerd I wouldn’t have wasted my time changing the app’s settings.  I just would have stopped voting after a day or two.  So I think the contest’s crappy facebook app hurt the number of entries that were received this year and it also probably reduced the number of votes that were cast.  I really hope that the Crash the Super Bowl contest comes back next year but I also hope that the folks at FritoLay realize that a bunch of meaningless “likes” and “shares” aren’t worth the damage they’re doing to their brand.  Moving The Crash the Facebook made the biggest user-generated ad contest in history feel small….and that’s a damn shame.
 

How much did the 2013 finalists spend on their Crash the Super Bowl entries?

FritoLay gets a crazy amount of free publicity from the Crash the Super Bowl contest because the media loves the idea that “average joes” can beat Madison avenue at their own game.  While it’s true that Doritos’ CTSB commercials have relatively microscopic budgets I’m not sure it’s accurate to say that these “consumer made” ads were created by amateurs.  Once in a while there will be a low budget success story like last year’s $20 ad “Man’s Best Friend” but the truth is that most of the people who make the finals are professional or semi-professional filmmakers who spend THOUSANDS of dollars to get to the Top 5.

Does that sound unfair?  Well, get over it because it’s not!  The Super Bowl is the biggest TV event of the year and a million dollars in prize money is at stake.  So Doritos can’t pick commercials that look cheap or cheesy.  It takes money and talent to create a 30 second video that is technically good enough to air on television and I tip my hat to all the folks who have the cojones to do what it takes to win this contest.

So how much does it actually cost to make the Crash the Super Bowl finals?  Well Doritos always puts out some background info about the winners and sometimes they include the budgets of every commercial that makes the top 5.  You can check out the 2013 press page here but I’ll post some of the basic info that FritoLay provided.  Yes, the numbers in green indicate how much that person spent on their submission.

-

Spot: Goat 4 Sale
Creator: Ben Callner
Budget: $5,000
Occupation: Freelance Film Director
City/hometown: Decatur, GA

Spot: Road Chip
Creator: Tyler Dixon
Budget: $2,500
Occupation: Freelance writer/director
City: Los Angeles, CA and Lehi, UT

Spot: Fashionista Daddy
Creator: Mark Freiburger
Budget: $300
Occupation: Freelance Director
City: Los Angeles, CA

Spot: Express Checkout
Creator: Sasha Shemirani
Budget: $1,000
Occupation: Photographer
City: Los Angeles, CA

Spot: Fetch
Creator: Joe Taranto
Budget: $5,000
Occupation: Student/director
City: Los Angeles, CA

-

So….this is easily the most expensive group of Crash the Super Bowl finalists we’ve ever seen.  TWO entries cost more than $5,000(!) to produce and the others weren’t exactly shot on the cheap either.   It’s also worth noting that all but 4 of the 5 winners live in Los Angeles and 5 out of 5 of them listed their occupation as some kind of photographer or filmmaker.  Obviously anyone from anywhere in the US could make the Crash the Super Bowl finals but year after year we see that most of the winners are male filmmakers aged 20 to 40 from Southern California who spend more than $1,000 producing their submission. I’m not saying you need to move to LA if you want to win The Crash next year but if you come up with an amazing idea you’re probably going to have to spend a serious chunk of change on your video if you want to be a serious contender in this contest.
 


Designed by: Free Cell Phones | Thanks to Highest CD Rates, Domain Registration and Registry Software